Saturday, April 15, 2006
XVII, XVIII or XV???
Truth is, I have no idea of the correct number. If we go once a year from the "official" first Men's Retreat of 1989, this would be XVII, wouldn't it? But then what to do about the years in which we did two (XV-a doesn't really work) or the Mulligan Year of 1992, for instance? And by the way, I do think as a Platonic/Aristotelian goal, we should try to move back to twice-yearly Men's Retreats (spring and fall editions).
Comments:
<< Home
This is kind of like trying to get the Prots, the Catholics, and the Orthodox to agree on how many books there are in the Bible.
I say,defer to the Orthodox, 'cause they tend to get real pissy when they don't get their way, and then they go on and on about the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople.
Steve, your call.
sincerely,
a schimatic westerner
I say,defer to the Orthodox, 'cause they tend to get real pissy when they don't get their way, and then they go on and on about the Fourth Crusade and the sacking of Constantinople.
Steve, your call.
sincerely,
a schimatic westerner
In light of me having to cancel my sabbatical, my vestry suggested that I take the opportunity to take off a few more Sundays here and there. This may improve the chances (for me at least) of a bi-annual TMR.
Post a Comment
<< Home
